It shouldn’t come as any surprise that Robert’s Rules says when something’s official, it needs to be official. Which means, the tellers report—we’re talking about the on-paper vote count—can’t just exist on the back of a spare copy of the agenda because you couldn’t find anything else to write on.

The tellers report is . . . (drumroll) . . . an official, organized report that goes in the minutes. I’ve talked in recent posts about how to count ballots. Today, I’m going to help you with how to collect that information and place it in a formal report that you can share with the members.

Step 1: Determine the number of votes cast.

Step 2: Identify any illegal votes.

Step 3: Count the ballots marked for each candidate or position.

Step 4: Fill out the tellers report.

There are four categories of information on a tellers report:

  • number of votes cast
  • number of votes necessary for election
  • number of votes received by each candidate or position
  • number of illegal votes and the reason(s) they are illegal

And, before we go any further, here’s some clarification: The number of votes necessary for election is more than half of the votes cast for a specific candidate or position (unless your bylaws say otherwise, of course).

So, let’s say you just held an election for president and vice-president, with both offices listed on the same ballot. Here’s what your tellers report should look like:

President
Number of votes cast 51
Necessary for election (majority) 26
Perfect Patty 30
Loser Larry 3
Mediocre Matt 15
Illegal Votes
Wanda Wannabe (disqualified and ineligible) 2
Two ballots folded together for Mediocre Matt 1

 

Vice-President
Number of votes cast 56
Necessary for election (majority) 29
Sam Second String 14
Chad Champion 33
Greta Good Sport 6
Illegal Votes
Illegible write-in votes 3

 

Two things to note here: The number of votes cast is specific to a candidate or position. Just because members vote for several offices on one ballot doesn’t mean that the number of votes cast is the same for each office. Members might vote for vice-president but not president.

And, the report shouldn’t include the number of members eligible to vote or the number of members abstaining.

Step 5: Give the report to the chairman.

One final word. Tellers don’t announce who won. The chairman does.

I get that you’re excited about the utter greatness of your tellers report, but don’t go running into the meeting room and spill the beans about who won. In parliamentary procedure, the announcement, like everything, is a specific process.

  • You tell the chairman that you’re ready to read the report.
  • On her cue, you read the report out loud to the group and then hand the report to the chairman. (Remember, the report doesn’t say who won. It just says the number of votes for each candidate.)
  • The chairman will then re-read the report out loud and end it by declaring the winner for each office.

 

Why You Should Hire a Professional Parliamentarian for Your Annual Meeting – Part 2Last week’s post was intended to make you think. . . . Think about getting professional help from a Robert’s Rules of Order guru instead of winging it. Think about securing the real deal to run (or help you run) the dreaded annual meeting. Think about hiring someone who can make you look good and save you a ton of time. Here are three more relevant issues as you consider consulting with a professional parliamentarian.

A Professional Parliamentarian Can Keep You Out of Trouble.

Like I stated in my second point last week, professional parliamentarians have participated in more meetings than most people will ever attend—or ever want to attend—in a lifetime. We can look at an agenda and tell you where the trouble spots will be. We know where elections can tend to go awry, and we know what problems bylaw amendments can cause.

Odds are, we’ve experienced whatever your trouble is multiple times before. A professional can help you anticipate mess and hopefully avoid it.

A Professional Parliamentarian Can Be a Resource for Members.

Every organization has a few (sometimes vocal) members with extra questions and strong opinions. These people should not be allowed to “run the show,” but neither should they be marginalized. Finding that balance can often be a full-time job for the officers and board. Also, it’s wearisome.

Professional parliamentarians definitely have an advantage on this one. We’re hired as neutral experts on the rules, and we don’t have any personal history with the highly opinionated question-askers in your group. In fact, we’ll be happy to take the non-fun job of listening to them and answering their questions. You’d be surprised how far this effort will go in helping them feel heard and guiding them as to the right time, place, and way to state their opinions. Trust me—having a professional parliamentarian play that role can save you a lot of headaches.

But What About the Cost of a Professional Parliamentarian?

Good question. Here’s a simple answer on the fees for this line of work. For one, it doesn’t have to be expensive. Like any professional service, the scope of the work can vary, as can the fee arrangement. For example, you might need help with a specific question, an agenda, or a simple script. Alternatively, you might need someone to draft an extremely detailed script or be on-site for the meeting or for several days prior.

An experienced professional parliamentarian can help you discern group issues and the best use of your organization’s funds. You certainly can’t go wrong by thinking seriously about hiring a professional and reaching out to discuss your needs.